Your business is just that, your business. Your trade secrets – business intelligence, client lists, operational data – can easily walk out the door with an employee if he or she leaves for greener pastures. Protecting your business, and the time and resources you have dedicated to its success, should be a top priority. We can help you protect what you have built.
Our attorneys represent companies and related parties across the country in the pursuit or defense against employers who have violated restrictive covenants. We assist securities firms, financial institutions, health care and medical staffing companies, insurance companies, franchisees and franchisors, among others. We have litigated well over 300 restrictive covenant cases and have pursued and obtained injunctions in all U.S. contiguous states.
Restrictive Covenants. An Ounce of Prevention
We can show you how to make your existing policies stronger and more enforceable – or, if you don’t yet have policies in place, we can craft them for you. We will formulate guidelines that will protect your business now and provide you with the necessary legal foundation should an issue arise in the future.
We can assist with drafting and instituting trade secret and data management policies that will provide your employees with a clear understanding of proper access, scope, and use of your business intelligence. Additionally, the use of restrictive covenants in employment contracts can provide clear instructions to and set necessary privacy expectations for your employees, making it clear that the business will not tolerate the misuse or theft of business intelligence.
Hiring and Recruiting
Are you hiring an employee who is subject to a restrictive covenant? While these agreements can protect your relationships and trade secrets, it is important to keep in mind the potential risks of bringing over employees from competitors who are subject to such agreements.
Our attorneys can provide proactive advice to help avoid litigation and put you in a more favorable position if you (or your new employee) are sued. We help employers ask the right questions during recruiting in order to structure onboarding policies and practices to best protect their interests to avoid litigation or minimize exposure if litigation is looming.
We also advise on the importance of ensuring new employees do not – purposely or inadvertently – retain materials from a previous employer. This common occurrence can lead to costly lawsuits if proper precautions are not taken.
Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs) and Litigation
Employment relationships don’t last forever, and the stars you hired three years ago may be moving on. The departure is bad enough, yet when they leave and take business trade secrets with them, your response is critical and time is of the essence. Every day that goes by, your business could lose customers and your ability to recover damages diminishes.
If you wait to act, your former employee can point to that delay as proof that the situation was not urgent and that your claims are unsubstantiated.
Working quickly on your behalf, we can evaluate the situation or claim and make timely recommendations, sometimes using potential court action as leverage. The quick and accurate evaluation of your situation and associated claim is the key to moving forward successfully.
- Emergency and other relief related to the misappropriation of trade secrets, the enforcement of restrictive covenants and unfair competition.
- Defended individual financial advisors when sued by their former employers and counseled individual financial advisors as they contemplated joining a new firm.
- In two different cases, obtained a temporary restraining order and permanent injunction on behalf of Enterprise Fleet Management against a departed employee. Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc. v. Guinn 2018 WL 7958815, E.D.Mo., Feb. 15, 2018. Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc. v. Polak, 4:18-cv-01187-AGF (2018).
- Defended a large international manufacturer's representative in a trade secret case in the U.S. District Court for New Jersey. Although damaging evidence was uncovered during discovery, the case was settled on favorable terms for the client.
- Enforced non-competition and non-solicitation clauses in an employment agreement against a physician who was terminated from a practice group. The court upheld both restrictive covenants.
- Successfully defended a claim brought by an employer against an employee salesperson to enforce non-competition and non-solicitation clauses in an employment agreement.
Obtained injunctive relief for a pizza restaurant franchisor against a terminated franchisee, enjoining the franchisee from continuing to violate the noncompete covenant in its franchise agreement by selling pizza at the location of its former franchise.
News & Insights
Seminars & Speaking Engagements
- Association of Corporate Counsel, St. Louis, Missouri, February 16, 2021
- April 16, 2020
- May 23, 2016
- Collaboration, 3D Printing, and The Defend Trade Secrets Act - A perfect storm for litigation? Or an opportunity to implement steps now to manage this risk?May 12, 2016
- May 2016
- August 22, 2012
- Impact | Business Risk Management Blog, June 15, 2021
- What Is Solicitation? Illinois Court Considers Doctor’s Method and Intent in Targeting Patients by MailImpact | Business Risk Management Blog, April 1, 2021
- Pending Illinois Legislation to Restrict the Use of Covenants Not to Compete and Covenants Not to SolicitImpact | Business Risk Management Blog, March 15, 2021
- Impact | Business Risk Management Blog, March 3, 2021
- SimplyHR | Employment & Labor Blog , March 2, 2021
- To Protect Confidential Information and Trade Secrets, Businesses Need to Know the Difference Between ThemImpact | Business Risk Management Blog, January 28, 2021
- Impact | Business Risk Management Blog, January 21, 2021
- State of Illinois files suit to declare non-competes that bind low wage employees are unlawful and unenforceableImpact | Business Risk Management Blog, November 6, 2017
- Another judge in the Northern District of Illinois rejects bright line test for restrictive covenantsImpact | Business Risk Management Blog, November 1, 2017
- Impact | Business Risk Management Blog, June 8, 2016
- Impact | Business Risk Management Blog, March 22, 2016
- Impact | Business Risk Management Blog, March 2, 2016
- Impact | Business Risk Management Blog, February 10, 2016
- Impact | Business Risk Management Blog, February 9, 2016
- Impact | Business Risk Management Blog, February 1, 2016
- Impact | Business Risk Management Blog, January 19, 2016
- Impact | Business Risk Management Blog, January 5, 2016
- The cyber threat from within: The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act as a weapon against theft of confidential information by departing employeesImpact | Business Risk Management Blog, July 15, 2015
- Impact | Business Risk Management Blog, July 6, 2015
- Impact | Business Risk Management Blog, May 21, 2015
- Consider The Enforceability of Restrictive Covenant Provisions By Third Party Purchasers When Drafting AgreementsImpact | Business Risk Management Blog, January 21, 2015
- Impact | Business Risk Management Blog, October 27, 2014
- Setting Forth the Damages the Employer is Entitled to if an Employee Breaches His/Her Non-Competition Agreement Will Help Deter Breaches and Save Money in LitigationImpact | Business Risk Management Blog, October 7, 2014
- Make Sure Your Non-Competition, Non-Disclosure and Non-Solicitation Agreements Have Extension ClausesImpact | Business Risk Management Blog, October 2, 2014
- Financial Information, Aging and Sales Reports and Laboratory Equipment Wish List Found To Be Trade SecretsImpact | Business Risk Management Blog, September 30, 2014
- Impact | Business Risk Management Blog, September 26, 2014
- Impact | Business Risk Management Blog, September 24, 2014
- Impact | Business Risk Management Blog, September 18, 2014
- Impact | Business Risk Management Blog, September 15, 2014
- If You Overreach, A Business Owner May Find Employee Restrictive Covenants to be Useless and UnenforceableImpact | Business Risk Management Blog, August 13, 2014
- SimplyHR | Employment & Labor Blog , November 15, 2013
- SimplyHR | Employment & Labor Blog , September 4, 2013